We interviewed the Grumpy Cosplay Boyfriend’s last week, we now interview the cosplayer, and girlfriend behind him; Stacey Rebecca!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/geekpridetv
Tweets by GeekPride1
http://www.facebook.com/geekpride1
We interviewed the Grumpy Cosplay Boyfriend’s last week, we now interview the cosplayer, and girlfriend behind him; Stacey Rebecca!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/geekpridetv
Tweets by GeekPride1
http://www.facebook.com/geekpride1
Nick abandoned me because he is a fuck head. Luckily Dave stepped in for passionate cuddling and erotic tension. Who’s the bear? grrrr
Everyone put your hands together and let us give artist Stephen Byrne a well deserved round of applause. For what he has created is a work, not only highlighting his awesome skills of animation, but for also making me want, neigh, demand more.
Byrne has created an intro opening sequence to a show he calls The Animated Adventures of Buffy and it has excitedly awakened my craving for the days of vampire slaying/shagging, dancing demons and cute boots. Buffy, Willow, Xander, Giles and more are back in this one minute teaser, keep your eyes open and you’ll spot a few easter eggs in the mix. If I could pour what little cash I have into a project to become a thing THIS is what would get my precious pounds, I’m certain you will feel the same.
Tom Towles is one of those actors that will leave you with a lasting impression. Known for mostly playing villains and less than charming characters, Towles’s career has spanned over forty years, with roles in memorable movies such as Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, Halloween, Night of the Living Dead and all of the movies Rob Zombie has directed, not to mention his theatre work and his involvement with fan favourites: Star Trek: Voyager or Firefly. Given his versatility and the uncanny ability to make each role different from the last one, I can’t say I’m surprised.
We were lucky enough to get to ask him a few questions, which makes you doubly lucky since you get to read the answers, which offer a great insight in the inner workings of the man’s mind, not to mention a lot of valuable lessons about the movie and theatre industry.
Acting is something that attracts a lot of people, each with a different story of what made them try it out. How did you start and how did you make it, given that a lot of those that set their hopes on this career end up returning to whatever they used to do before.
I have been incredibly lucky and tenacious by default. I started out as a photography student at Columbia College in Chicago after my discharge from the Marine Corps. I had been a photographer in the Corps and managed to convince the admissions people that I was worthy of a scholarship, but after my first semester I was side tracked into acting (a much higher ratio of women to men). The dumb luck part is that the head of the department thought I had some talent and they transferred my scholarship to the theatre department and that got me my first job with Paul Sills and his Story theatre Company. That got me my Actors Equity card, which gave me my first two Broadway shows. The tenacious by default came with the realization that I was emotionally unsuited to standard forms of employment. That severely limited my options to some form of institutional care or the entertainment industry. Having suffered that epiphany my choice became clear: I was an actor for life or some such nonsense. The moral of all that is: Relentless tenacity – or severely limited options – trumps talent every time.
In terms of acting, do you think anyone has influenced your style or the choices you’ve made throughout your career? Any favourite actors or actresses that impacted you one way or the other?
The deeper truth of my story is that I, at a level I did not comprehend early on, had wanted to be an actor from the moment I saw Ernest Borgnine in “Marty” when I was really to young to completely understand it. Something inside me lit up when I realized you didn’t have to be beautiful to be an actor. From that point on I followed the character guys – the one’s too ugly to be leads but supremely talented – Jack Klugman, Strother Martin, L. Q. Jones. Just as an aside: My hero Ernie beat James Dean, Marlon Brando and Spencer Tracy to win the Academy Award for Best Actor in 1955. In that moment he broke the mold and changed my world. But as much as I loved the character guy I was enraptured by the great stage actors: Lawrence Olivier, Christopher Plummer, Christopher Walken and Anthony Hopkins. I never saw Olivier on stage but I did see Hopkins, Walken and Plummer on Broadway and they were stunning. As far as actress go I always loved Lillian Gish in “Night of the Hunter”, Piper Laurie in “Carrie”, Kathleen Turner in “Body Heat” (brilliant writing and directing by Lawrence Kasdan). All of these men and women have added something, not only to my awareness of the acting process but to the compendium of the craft itself.
Out of all the roles that you played so far, which one do you consider your favourite and why?
I can’t honestly say there is a favourite role because any given piece of work is a uniquely synergistic journey that revolves around a collective focus to bring to life the written word, as the foundation of the Directors vision. So individual parts are elevated or submerged based on who I worked with vs. what I played. All that is to say I had as spectacular a time working with Robert DeNiro, Richard Dreyfuss and William Forsythe as I did with Rob Zombie, John McNaughton and William Shatner. They were all great working events. But there is one moment that I do love in the movie “The Borrower” when I eat a rat. I see that scene and I still laugh.
Has there ever been a role that you passed on, only to regret it later? Could you tell us what it was?
If I passed on it I never regret it. That’s second-guessing myself and that only leads to madness. The projects I have passed on had some, usually, horrible writing or the people involved seemed entirely too strange and undependable to work with. I don’t remember any of their names but nobody else does either.
You’ve starred in quite a few sci-fi shows: Star Trek: Voyager, Firefly and the more humorous 3rd Rock from the Sun, as well as a lot of horror films: Night of the Living Dead and Halloween to name only a few. Do you count yourself among the fans of these genres? (You’re getting a Geek Pride cupcake if you do.)
I am a major sci-fi geek! I love the genre and loved all of the shows you listed long before they put me to work. That goes back to the dumb luck reality. I grew up on Star Trek and was heart broken when it (the original) was cancelled so it naturally followed that I would be devoted to the returns. Third Rock was a huge fave of mine from the first episode. I thought it was brilliant and working on it was a joy. Joss Whedon is one of the truly great creative minds around I followed his work from the moment I saw the Buffy the movie. Experience told me the movie was barely the surface of what he had to offer. I was right! Have you seen his “Dr. Horrible’s Sing Along Blog”?
Horror is another story. I love the genre when it works. By that I mean really scares me, not gross me out. Horror should reduce you to your most childlike pee in your pants terror state. This means psychological terror, not dismembering mayhem. Real terror is something that allows the audience/reader to scare him/herself by filling in the spaces of what you don’t see, but imagine. Every member of the audience, every reader will selectively choose the exact fear that works for them. Most horror – this applies mostly to movies – is slasher bullshit. The great horror movies, in my arrogant opinion, are: the 1963 “The Haunting” with Julie Harris, Stanley Kubrick’s “The Shinning” and the 1980 “The Changeling” with George C. Scott. These are the personification of “Holy Fuck!!!” Horror. The older ones that still hold up are almost all of universals horror list, but especially: “The Bride of Frankenstein” still radiant as a piece of film not so much horrifying as flat out great. “The Creature Form the Black Lagoon” and original “Body Snatchers”!
Theatre or film? Given your experience with both, could you ever make the choice or is it an impossible one? Since you did theatre for quite a while, do you have any favourite plays that you did or would like to do?
Theatre without a doubt! She was my first love and my most abiding, but it is so much work and so difficult to earn a living that, like most great lovers, she will always live in my memory, but we can’t be together. Film has made me indolent and frail, unable to muster the stamina for twelve hours of rehearsal and eight performances a week. So I must release her to younger lovers. The only play I really regret never having done is Shakespeare “Richard the Third”. C’est la vie.
Your career spans a few decades and you have starred in quite a lot of projects that resonate with people, films and series that stood the test of time. Is there a role that followed you throughout your career? One role that you feared you’ll never be able to shake, that made you fear that you might end up type-cast?
I have always been type cast. I have been a villain from my first show and I have loved it. I don’t think it’s possible to make a living in movies and not be “Type Cast” it is a profoundly modular business run more by money people with very little imagination who think, for the most part, in stereotypes. This is why real creativity seems so startling and is usually profoundly successful. But it’s completely understandable: the dollar amounts involved in making a movie are enormous.
You got the chance to work with quite a lot of actors and actresses. Is there anyone that you would’ve liked to star opposite, someone that you didn’t get the chance to act alongside of yet?
I would LOVED to have worked with Sir Laurence Olivier. He had something special I would like to have experienced in a shared performance.
Since we were on the topic of people you’d like to star opposite, what projects would you be interested in doing? There are quite a lot of “hot” things at the moment, from Game of Thrones to anything Marvel and more independent film scripts than ever.
I’m not sure I have the intense passion for acting I once had. I’m still trying to decide how I feel about it. I enjoy writing these days with a passion that I had for acting. I preformed on stage and screen for forty years. I think it may be time to do something different. All that I loved about acting began with great stories and words; that love of words still burns brightly. I have had some success with writing and I’d like to expand on it.
On a less professional note, what are some of your hobbies? Some of the things you do when the cameras aren’t rolling?
My biggest hobby is reading. Frankly its passed hobby and entered into a full fledged addiction. Followed less addictively by bike riding.
Let’s get downright personal and live on the wild side with this next question: What’s your favourite Game of Thrones character. Based on silly internet testing, that will tell us everything there is to know about you. (assuming you watch it/read the books).
Tyrion Lannister, Arya Stark, Jon Snow. In that order. Of course I watch it!! Peter Dinklage rules!! (I can’t bring myself to start the books. I am to easily habituated to good stories so I’ll wait until he finishes the next book)
Since we already went to the dark side with the before question, could you tell us one fact about you that most people don’t know?
Probably not a good idea. What they don’t know can’t hurt me.
And given that this is the “hot” (ironically so) thing of the moment, what’s your opinion on the ice-bucket challenge? Would you do it if you were nominated?
I’m not completely sure what it is and what it’s for. I have only the slightest understanding that it may be for a reasonable, if not good, cause but beyond that I’m at a loss. I know it involves a bucket and ice. Would I do it if nominated? Depends on who nominated me and why.
Given your experience, what advice would you have for young, aspiring actors?
You must love it beyond rational thought. If you want to do it, it’s vanity; you can succeed but the ugly moments will kill you. If you need to do it, it’s art. But you must need it so badly that your head will explode if you don’t. This is the only thing that will allow you to survive the ugly parts. And always remember: tenacity overwhelms talent every time, but talent combined with tenacity is supreme.
Any messages for our Geek Pride fans out there?
Stand tall! Love what you love unabashedly! Love who you love unconditionally and don’t give a serious fuck about what somebody else thinks about any of it! And do no harm. There are no limits, YOU decide whether you succeed or fail NO ONE ELSE!!!!
Thank you very much for the opportunity to do this and I hope we’ll have the chance to talk again.
My opinion on DC’s film and TV ventures has been pretty thoroughly documented- from my love of the campy and fun Batman: The Brave and the Bold and Teen Titans Go! cartoons, to my bile-spewing hatred of Beware the Batman and every movie they’ve made since Superman II, to my uncomfortable ambivalence towards Smallville and Arrow. That said, the pilot episode of Gotham has proved to be, not just the best offering from DC in a long time (which is not amazingly high praise), but the best pilot episode of any TV show in recent memory. Let me explain why…
The Cast
From the moment Andrew Stewart-Jones and Victoria Cartagena appeared on-screen, I knew that was Crispus Allen and Renee Montoya. That is how spot-on the casting is in this show.

Cory Michael Smith fires off a hundred questions a minute as coroner Edward Nigma- and I predict, here and now, that he will get a solid share of Loki and Sherlock fangirls, to make a glorious trifecta of pale, dark-haired, scrawny sociopaths.

Robin Lord Taylor’s Oswald ‘Don’t Call Me Penguin’ Cobblepot flips between creepy, snivelly, psychotic and pragmatic with dizzying speed, turning a grotesque joke character into someone to be genuinely feared.

The real standout, however, is David Mazouz as the young Bruce Wayne. Child actors, as a rule, tend to let the side down; and I’ve yet to see a live-action Batman I liked… but any misgivings I may have had evaporated by the end of the episode. He gets the steely Bat-stare down better than any grown-up ever has, and even at this young age, he commands a respect from Jim Gordon and Alfred that will only increase as he grows into Batman.

The Setting
It’s hard to explain the difference between this version of Gotham City and previous incarnations, but I’ll have to try because this is literally my job. Usually, superhero cities (and fictional cities in general) are made up of establishing shots of existing cities, with the odd additional location thrown in as needed: in the Dark Knight trilogy, for example, Gotham City was played by Chicago and New York, with Mentmore Towers in Buckinghamshire putting in a guest appearance as Wayne Manor… and it works, sort of, in that it looks like a grimy city with a lot of old buildings and crime. This version of Gotham City looks like something pulled right out of the comics, from the twinkly nightlights…
…to the smoky wasteland of the industrial district.
And lest we think that the interiors have been neglected, think again. I swear this GCPD building was a level in Arkham City…

And Fish Mooney’s nightclub is just so perfectly decadent…

I should probably stop there, in case I start cooing over Crime Alley (so dark and grimy!) the future Mrs Gordon’s penthouse apartment (such a big window!) and the Pepper family’s hovel (so depressing!). I was expecting Gotham to be just a backdrop, like Arrow‘s Starling City, but they’ve made it a full-on character. Which is good, considering they named the show after it.
The Mood
In case all those gorgeous set pictures didn’t give it away, Gotham is definitely going for a huge noir feel. All the trimmings are there: rain, grey skies, near-perpetual night, shady dives, old-style cars and corrupt politicians…

Harvey Bullock is the quintessential fedora-and-trenchcoat, hard-drinking cynical detective whose comfort zone is the morally grey area, and not an inch outside of it. Fish Mooney is the gorgeous femme fatale out for number one. Jim Gordon is the idealist who wants to bring down the system. Carmine Falcone is the untouchable crime lord who runs it all. All that’s missing is the gravel-voiced internal monologue… but then that might be pushing things.
The Plot
Beyond the obvious origin stories for Penguin, Poison Ivy, Catwoman, Riddler (and, we’re promised, Hugo Strange, Mr Freeze, Joker, Scarecrow and Harvey Dent), the pilot leaves a lot of room for story arcs to develop over the course of the season. Who are the dirty cops and how can they be weeded out? Who really killed Thomas and Martha Wayne? Well, obviously it was Joe Chill, but why? And how are the honest cops of the GCPD going to catch him? Can Jim Gordon stick to his principles, or will he have to make compromises for the greater good? When will Pamela Isley stop being referred to by the godawful name of Ivy Pepper?
I don’t know about you guys, but for the first time in a long time, I’m excited. Same Bat-time, same Bat-channel?
It might not come as a surprise to some, but it has been officially confirmed that X-Men veteran Bryan Singer will return to direct the mutant’s upcoming outing, X-Men: Apocalypse. Although Singer had previously mentioned even before Days Of Future Past was released that Apocalypse would be next in the works, it seems that Singer wants to protect his so-called ‘baby’ cinematic franchise further; even after putting right all the wrongs that came about in his absence from X-3. Clearly there is good reason for this, especially given that in our favourite mutant’s next installment they will tackle one of Marvel’s most popular foes, Apocalypse; as featured in the post-credit scene of Days Of Future Past.
Despite it being noted that Apocalypse will a continuation of the X-Men:First Class ensemble, it has yet to be revealed whether or not the mutants from the first 3 films will be portrayed as their younger selves; especially seeing as Apocalypse will be set 20 years before the first X-Men film. What is made clear however is that while apocalypse is still in its early stages, the films writer Simon Kinberg, who recently spoke with Yahoo! Movies has more than taken this matter in to consideration:
“It’d be very hard to do, because Halle, Famke, and Jimmy and others have done such wonderful jobs of bringing those characters to life,” says Kinberg “But I also would have said before First Class that there would be no actors who can stand alongside Ian McKellan and Patrick Stewart.” – Simon Kinberg.
However despite this welcoming big news about Singer returning to the franchise that he has nurtured from the get go, it appears that FOX are keeping coy on other news revolving around the film; at least until it is closer the film’s release date of 2016. What is clear though is that with the story revolving around ancient super-villain Apocalypse, the mutant’s next cinematic outing will be on par to Man of Steel destruction-wise; making it all the more exciting.
X-Men: Apocalypse is set to be released on 27th May 2016.
If Dark Souls and Streets of Rage somehow met, knocked digital boots and gave birth to a dark spawn then the result would be Iron Fisticle. It was these kind of thoughts that I couldn’t get out of my head as I played through the latest rogue-like offering from indie publishers Curve Studios. It’s a furiously difficult 16-bit style adventure where a hunk of roasted street chicken is often the only difference between survival and the Game Over screen.
Launched exclusively for PC on Steam as of right now, Iron Fisticle’s story isn’t important and the game makes that plainly obvious from the get-go. It’s a simple grind through room after room of enemy hordes and the aim is to survive until the next section. Each room finishes with a key that becomes available after the core enemies have been destroyed and the trick is to get the key and escape before the behemoths that simultaneously spawn with the key find a way to pin you down.
The audio is textbook indie chip-tune fare that works well with the game’s twin-stick mechanics and art style. Just as in the rest of the game, nothing here is going to make it on the industry hall of fame or even into the 2014 record books however there is enough game to keep anybody going for a while. The local co-op support is prime for some really enjoyable game nights just as long as you don’t all mind crowding around a PC.
My only complaint regarding Iron Fisticle would be that it places a lot of emphasis on using a controller and preferably of the Xinput Xbox 360 or Xbox One variety. Admittedly this is highlighted in a warning that’s displayed whenever the game is started and follows a trend that is becoming more popular by the day on Steam however it could prove to be a deterrent for PC purists. Keyboard controls were clearly an afterthought and using the standard configuration was clumsy at best. Whilst it is possible to play the game using the keyboard and I actually managed a short session on my laptop over the weekend, you’re probably going to want to dust off the 360 pad for this one.
Overall, Iron Fisticle is an enjoyable and addictive if not slightly unoriginal experience that old-school twin stick shooter and rogue-like fans will no doubt fall in love with. It’s available now on Steam for the reasonable, if not slightly random, price of £5.39/$8.09 and even those who already starting to find the whole second coming of 16-bit a little tiring are likely to find some entertainment here.
Sometimes you play a game and it changes the way you play those sorts of games. Dark Souls is a good example: it fair-on ruins you for many games, making you expect and learn from failure where many games handhold you through a walk in the skyboxes.
For me, Project CARS was a similar experience. I only got to play two tracks, with a few different vehicles, but it was such an interesting experience. For full disclosure, I’ve always been more of an arcade player when it comes to racing games: Mario Kart and Burnout are my thing in this genre. I’ve never been able to get on with racing games in general, and those I have played have been more cartoony than realistic. When I started playing, I tried to do a braking turn around a tight bend: I ended up spinning off like I was driving on ice.

I laughed, restarted the race, and tried to be more careful. As the next turn came up, I decided to try and undertake the pack ahead of me, pulling a sharper turn to leap a few places ahead. My AI opponents were having none of this, though, and they ensured I was given no room. One even bumped me away, sending me spinning again.
So I had to learn to play a little more like I was really driving. I had to be cautious, cagey, but also bold in the right ways. The game taught me how to play it with subtle clues such as the brake lights of my opponents, as well as the more obvious suggested route. I even got to watch the AI assault one of their own, making the car flip over and crash out of the race, which was as impressive as it was hilarious.
Project CARS hooked me immediately. And I mean immediately: it was during the loading screen that I saw just how much the game will stand out, when I learned there’s a button specifically for the windscreen wipers.
“Why is that there?” I asked.
The daft question earned an interesting answer: “Because people asked for it.”
When Project CARS began, it was with Slightly Mad Studios reaching out to customers to ask what they’d like to see in a racing game. The engine was built from the ground up on the back of player’s requests, becoming a Kickstarter game and then being picked up by Bandai Namco. People asked to have windscreen wipers so they could feel what it was like to race, first person, during a heavy storm, and so that feature is there. This games is filled with requests like this; A company giving people features they ask for, rather than slavishly aiming to be as realistic as possible at the expense of the gameplay.

Project CARS could be called Victory By A Thousand Cuts, really: the attention to detail in gameplay features is staggering, from an on-screen rear view mirror to customisable angles in the many viewpoints available. The game can connect to weather services and find mimic the conditions of any day for the race courses, meaning you can reproduce crippling storms or hurricanes if you want to. Even the night sky is based on how the stars looked on that evening, or even the day you’re playing. You even have the Trials Fusion-esque option of resetting your race if you crash, which I needed. The AI, the handling, almost everything you can think of is customisable.
If it meets its full potential on launch, Project CARS will be more a triumph than a game, delivering to people a delightfully thorough experience. I say this mostly as it’ll be the first racing game I have bought since Mario Kart DS.
Project CARS is coming out for the PS4, Xbox One, PC, and Wii U in November 2014. For more, go here.